CHEAD Conference 2017 Delegate Survey

Question Title

* 1. How did you hear about the conference?

Invitation by CHEAD through your institutions membership

Suggestion by a colleague to attend

Via the CHEAD website

Other

Question Title

* 2. What did you expect to get from the conference, in relation to the particular demands of your role in HE?

Question Title

* 3. Please indicate your overall satisfaction with the conference.

Very Satisfied

Somewhat Satisfied

Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

Somewhat Dissatisfied

Very Dissatisfied

Question Title

* 4. Please give your ratings 1-5 for the different sessions, with 5 being outstanding and 1 being unsatisfactory?

	Unsatisfactory	Poor	Satisfactory	Good	Outstanding
Clive Gillman, Creative Industries, Creative Scotland	Clive Gillman, Creative Industries, Creative Scotland Unsatisfactory	Clive Gillman, Creative Industries, Creative Scotland Poor	Clive Gillman, Creative Industries, Creative Scotland Satisfactory	Clive Gillman, Creative Industries, Creative Scotland Good	Clive Gillman, Creative Industries, Creative Scotland Outstanding
Gian Luca Amadei, Design, British Council	Gian Luca Amadei, Design, British Council Unsatisfactory	Gian Luca Amadei, Design, British Council Poor	Gian Luca Amadei, Design, British Council Satisfactory	Gian Luca Amadei, Design, British Council Good	Gian Luca Amadei, Design, British Council Outstanding
Eliza Easton, Creative Industries Federation	Eliza Easton, Creative Industries Federation Unsatisfactory	Eliza Easton, Creative Industries Federation Poor	Eliza Easton, Creative Industries Federation Satisfactory	Eliza Easton, Creative Industries Federation Good	Eliza Easton, Creative Industries Federation Outstanding
Carla Delfos, ELIA	Carla Delfos, ELIA Unsatisfactory	Carla Delfos, ELIA Poor	Carla Delfos, ELIA Satisfactory	Carla Delfos, ELIA Good	Carla Delfos, ELIA Outstanding
Anastasia Butrym, British Higher School of Art and Design	Anastasia Butrym, British Higher School of Art and Design Unsatisfactory	Anastasia Butrym, British Higher School of Art and Design Poor	Anastasia Butrym, British Higher School of Art and Design Satisfactory	Anastasia Butrym, British Higher School of Art and Design Good	Anastasia Butrym, British Higher School of Art and Design Outstanding
Alessandro Colombo, IED - Istituto Europeo di Design	Alessandro Colombo, IED - Istituto Europeo di Design Unsatisfactory	Alessandro Colombo, IED - Istituto Europeo di Design Poor	Alessandro Colombo, IED - Istituto Europeo di Design Satisfactory	Alessandro Colombo, IED - Istituto Europeo di Design Good	Alessandro Colombo, IED - Istituto Europeo di Design Outstanding
Professor Hugo de Burgh, China Media Centre	Professor Hugo de Burgh, China Media Centre Unsatisfactory	Professor Hugo de Burgh, China Media Centre Poor	Professor Hugo de Burgh, China Media Centre Satisfactory	Professor Hugo de Burgh, China Media Centre Good	Professor Hugo de Burgh, China Media Centre Outstanding
Mike Knowles, Sushant School of Design	Mike Knowles, Sushant School of Design Unsatisfactory	Mike Knowles, Sushant School of Design Poor	Mike Knowles, Sushant School of Design Satisfactory	Mike Knowles, Sushant School of Design Good	Mike Knowles, Sushant School of Design Outstanding
Richard Everett, Education British Council India	Richard Everett, Education British Council India Unsatisfactory	Richard Everett, Education British Council India Poor	Richard Everett, Education British Council India Satisfactory	Richard Everett, Education British Council India Good	Richard Everett, Education British Council India Outstanding
Ross Sinclair, Artist / The Glasgow School of Art	Ross Sinclair, Artist / The Glasgow School of Art Unsatisfactory	Ross Sinclair, Artist / The Glasgow School of Art Poor	Ross Sinclair, Artist / The Glasgow School of Art Satisfactory	Ross Sinclair, Artist / The Glasgow School of Art Good	Ross Sinclair, Artist / The Glasgow School of Art Outstanding
Professor Craig Richardson, Loughborough University	Professor Craig Richardson, Loughborough University Unsatisfactory	Professor Craig Richardson, Loughborough University Poor	Professor Craig Richardson, Loughborough University Satisfactory	Professor Craig Richardson, Loughborough University Good	Professor Craig Richardson, Loughborough University Outstanding
Professor Vicky Gunn, The Glasgow School of Art	Professor Vicky Gunn, The Glasgow School of Art Unsatisfactory	Professor Vicky Gunn, The Glasgow School of Art Poor	Professor Vicky Gunn, The Glasgow School of Art Satisfactory	Professor Vicky Gunn, The Glasgow School of Art Good	Professor Vicky Gunn, The Glasgow School of Art Outstanding

Question Title

* 5. What was most valuable about the conference?

The presentations

The workshops

The Wednesday afternoon break to explore Edinburgh

The annual dinner

Networking

Time away from your institute to absorb and reflect

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 6. What was least valuable about the conference?

The presentations

The workshops

The Wednesday afternoon break to explore Edinburgh

The annual dinner

Networking

Time away from your institute to absorb and reflect

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 7. Did you think the structure of each day at the conference was:

Well paced

Just right

Too dense

Question Title

* 8. Did you think the time for networking was:

Too much

Just enough

Too little

Question Title

* 9. How would you rate the following items? Please use the scala of 1-5 with 5 being outstanding and 1 being unsatisfactory.

	Unsatisfactory	Poor	Satisfactory	Good	Outstanding
Relevance of conference contents	Relevance of conference contents Unsatisfactory	Relevance of conference contents Poor	Relevance of conference contents Satisfactory	Relevance of conference contents Good	Relevance of conference contents Outstanding
Quality of presentations	Quality of presentations Unsatisfactory	Quality of presentations Poor	Quality of presentations Satisfactory	Quality of presentations Good	Quality of presentations Outstanding
Information available online	Information available online Unsatisfactory	Information available online Poor	Information available online Satisfactory	Information available online Good	Information available online Outstanding
Registration process	Registration process Unsatisfactory	Registration process Poor	Registration process Satisfactory	Registration process Good	Registration process Outstanding
Conference venues/facilities	Conference venues/facilities Unsatisfactory	Conference venues/facilities Poor	Conference venues/facilities Satisfactory	Conference venues/facilities Good	Conference venues/facilities Outstanding
Organisational arrangements for and during the event	Organisational arrangements for and during the event Unsatisfactory	Organisational arrangements for and during the event Poor	Organisational arrangements for and during the event Satisfactory	Organisational arrangements for and during the event Good	Organisational arrangements for and during the event Outstanding
Dates of the conference	Dates of the conference Unsatisfactory	Dates of the conference Poor	Dates of the conference Satisfactory	Dates of the conference Good	Dates of the conference Outstanding
Social and networking events	Social and networking events Unsatisfactory	Social and networking events Poor	Social and networking events Satisfactory	Social and networking events Good	Social and networking events Outstanding

Question Title

* 1. How did you hear about the conference?

Question Title

* 2. What did you expect to get from the conference, in relation to the particular demands of your role in HE?

Question Title

* 3. Please indicate your overall satisfaction with the conference.

Question Title

* 4. Please give your ratings 1-5 for the different sessions, with 5 being outstanding and 1 being unsatisfactory?

Question Title

* 5. What was most valuable about the conference?

Question Title

* 6. What was least valuable about the conference?

Question Title

* 7. Did you think the structure of each day at the conference was:

Question Title

* 8. Did you think the time for networking was:

Question Title

* 9. How would you rate the following items? Please use the scala of 1-5 with 5 being outstanding and 1 being unsatisfactory.

Question Title

* 10. Is there anything else you would like to share with us?