Feedback on the Peer-Review Taxonomy Pilot

Feedback on the Peer-review Taxonomy Pilot

Springer Nature is participating in a pilot of NISO/STM's Working Group on Peer Review Taxonomy.

STM, the International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers, has recognized a need to identify and standardize definitions and terminology in peer review practices in order to help align nomenclature as more publishers use open peer review models

The current version of the taxonomy is available here.

In this survey, we would be grateful for your feedback on the proposed taxonomy and areas for improvement.
1.To what extent do you agree with the statement: The peer review taxonomy helps me establish the trustworthiness of the journal, its submissions, and/or its publications
2.Please elaborate on your answer above
3.To what extent do you agree with the statement: The peer review taxonomy should be adopted by all peer-reviewed journals
4.Please Elaborate on your answer above
5.Do you feel that the terminology used in the current taxonomy proposal (detailed here) is descriptive and easily understood? If not, please add feedback on specific areas that should be clarified.
6.Please include any other comments you have on the current taxonomy proposal. This will be very helpful to the working group in progressing forwards with this project
7.In what capacity are you responding?
8.From which journal did you access this survey?
Current Progress,
0 of 8 answered