Biocuration 2019

Biocuration 2019 - tell us your thoughts

Thank you for attending Biocuration 2019 in Cambridge, UK. We hope you enjoyed the meeting and can spare us some of your time to complete this survey.

We welcome your feedback on all aspects of the conference as this helps us when planning future meetings, ensuring they meet your needs and expectations.

Question Title

* 1. Please tell us your overall rating for the meeting

Poor

Satisfactory

Good

Very good

Excellent

Question Title

* 2. Please tell us how satisfied you were with the following elements of the meeting

	Very satisfied	Satisfied	Neither satisfied or unsatisfied	Unsatisfied	Very unsatisfied
Registration Process	Registration Process Very satisfied	Registration Process Satisfied	Registration Process Neither satisfied or unsatisfied	Registration Process Unsatisfied	Registration Process Very unsatisfied
Conference materials	Conference materials Very satisfied	Conference materials Satisfied	Conference materials Neither satisfied or unsatisfied	Conference materials Unsatisfied	Conference materials Very unsatisfied
Speakers / presenters	Speakers / presenters Very satisfied	Speakers / presenters Satisfied	Speakers / presenters Neither satisfied or unsatisfied	Speakers / presenters Unsatisfied	Speakers / presenters Very unsatisfied

Question Title

* 3. Please tell us how much you agree with the following statements:

	Strongly agree	Agree	Neither agree or disagree	Disagree	Strongly disagree
"I would recommend the conference to my colleagues"	"I would recommend the conference to my colleagues" Strongly agree	"I would recommend the conference to my colleagues" Agree	"I would recommend the conference to my colleagues" Neither agree or disagree	"I would recommend the conference to my colleagues" Disagree	"I would recommend the conference to my colleagues" Strongly disagree
"The conference represented a good opportunity to network"	"The conference represented a good opportunity to network" Strongly agree	"The conference represented a good opportunity to network" Agree	"The conference represented a good opportunity to network" Neither agree or disagree	"The conference represented a good opportunity to network" Disagree	"The conference represented a good opportunity to network" Strongly disagree
"The DATABASE journal virtual issue was important for this meeting"	"The DATABASE journal virtual issue was important for this meeting" Strongly agree	"The DATABASE journal virtual issue was important for this meeting" Agree	"The DATABASE journal virtual issue was important for this meeting" Neither agree or disagree	"The DATABASE journal virtual issue was important for this meeting" Disagree	"The DATABASE journal virtual issue was important for this meeting" Strongly disagree

Question Title

* 4. Please rate the workshops (score out of 5)

	1 (worst)	2	3 (average)	4	5 (best)	Did not attend
Developing the Gene Regulation Knowledge Commons	Developing the Gene Regulation Knowledge Commons 1 (worst)	Developing the Gene Regulation Knowledge Commons 2	Developing the Gene Regulation Knowledge Commons 3 (average)	Developing the Gene Regulation Knowledge Commons 4	Developing the Gene Regulation Knowledge Commons 5 (best)	Developing the Gene Regulation Knowledge Commons Did not attend
The IMEx consortium and molecular interactions: beyond A binds to B	The IMEx consortium and molecular interactions: beyond A binds to B 1 (worst)	The IMEx consortium and molecular interactions: beyond A binds to B 2	The IMEx consortium and molecular interactions: beyond A binds to B 3 (average)	The IMEx consortium and molecular interactions: beyond A binds to B 4	The IMEx consortium and molecular interactions: beyond A binds to B 5 (best)	The IMEx consortium and molecular interactions: beyond A binds to B Did not attend
2nd Phenotypes Traversing all the organisms workshop	2nd Phenotypes Traversing all the organisms workshop 1 (worst)	2nd Phenotypes Traversing all the organisms workshop 2	2nd Phenotypes Traversing all the organisms workshop 3 (average)	2nd Phenotypes Traversing all the organisms workshop 4	2nd Phenotypes Traversing all the organisms workshop 5 (best)	2nd Phenotypes Traversing all the organisms workshop Did not attend
Practical ontology applications, tooling and interoperability best practices for FAIRification	Practical ontology applications, tooling and interoperability best practices for FAIRification 1 (worst)	Practical ontology applications, tooling and interoperability best practices for FAIRification 2	Practical ontology applications, tooling and interoperability best practices for FAIRification 3 (average)	Practical ontology applications, tooling and interoperability best practices for FAIRification 4	Practical ontology applications, tooling and interoperability best practices for FAIRification 5 (best)	Practical ontology applications, tooling and interoperability best practices for FAIRification Did not attend
Mapping the landscape of biocuration - where are the biocurators and what do they need?	Mapping the landscape of biocuration - where are the biocurators and what do they need? 1 (worst)	Mapping the landscape of biocuration - where are the biocurators and what do they need? 2	Mapping the landscape of biocuration - where are the biocurators and what do they need? 3 (average)	Mapping the landscape of biocuration - where are the biocurators and what do they need? 4	Mapping the landscape of biocuration - where are the biocurators and what do they need? 5 (best)	Mapping the landscape of biocuration - where are the biocurators and what do they need? Did not attend
How should biological resources be evaluated?	How should biological resources be evaluated? 1 (worst)	How should biological resources be evaluated? 2	How should biological resources be evaluated? 3 (average)	How should biological resources be evaluated? 4	How should biological resources be evaluated? 5 (best)	How should biological resources be evaluated? Did not attend
Diverse perspectives on data licensing	Diverse perspectives on data licensing 1 (worst)	Diverse perspectives on data licensing 2	Diverse perspectives on data licensing 3 (average)	Diverse perspectives on data licensing 4	Diverse perspectives on data licensing 5 (best)	Diverse perspectives on data licensing Did not attend
Curating evidence of gene:disease validity for clinical omics	Curating evidence of gene:disease validity for clinical omics 1 (worst)	Curating evidence of gene:disease validity for clinical omics 2	Curating evidence of gene:disease validity for clinical omics 3 (average)	Curating evidence of gene:disease validity for clinical omics 4	Curating evidence of gene:disease validity for clinical omics 5 (best)	Curating evidence of gene:disease validity for clinical omics Did not attend
Biocuration in industry	Biocuration in industry 1 (worst)	Biocuration in industry 2	Biocuration in industry 3 (average)	Biocuration in industry 4	Biocuration in industry 5 (best)	Biocuration in industry Did not attend
Equality, diversity and inclusion	Equality, diversity and inclusion 1 (worst)	Equality, diversity and inclusion 2	Equality, diversity and inclusion 3 (average)	Equality, diversity and inclusion 4	Equality, diversity and inclusion 5 (best)	Equality, diversity and inclusion Did not attend
EMBL-EBI tools and resources	EMBL-EBI tools and resources 1 (worst)	EMBL-EBI tools and resources 2	EMBL-EBI tools and resources 3 (average)	EMBL-EBI tools and resources 4	EMBL-EBI tools and resources 5 (best)	EMBL-EBI tools and resources Did not attend

Question Title

* 5. Please rate the sessions (Score out of 5)

	1 (worst)	2	3 (average)	4	5 (best)	Did not attend
Keynote presentations	Keynote presentations 1 (worst)	Keynote presentations 2	Keynote presentations 3 (average)	Keynote presentations 4	Keynote presentations 5 (best)	Keynote presentations Did not attend
Poster session	Poster session 1 (worst)	Poster session 2	Poster session 3 (average)	Poster session 4	Poster session 5 (best)	Poster session Did not attend
Session 1: Functional Annotation	Session 1: Functional Annotation 1 (worst)	Session 1: Functional Annotation 2	Session 1: Functional Annotation 3 (average)	Session 1: Functional Annotation 4	Session 1: Functional Annotation 5 (best)	Session 1: Functional Annotation Did not attend
Session 2: Curation and data visualisation tools	Session 2: Curation and data visualisation tools 1 (worst)	Session 2: Curation and data visualisation tools 2	Session 2: Curation and data visualisation tools 3 (average)	Session 2: Curation and data visualisation tools 4	Session 2: Curation and data visualisation tools 5 (best)	Session 2: Curation and data visualisation tools Did not attend
Session 3: Curation for human health and nutrition	Session 3: Curation for human health and nutrition 1 (worst)	Session 3: Curation for human health and nutrition 2	Session 3: Curation for human health and nutrition 3 (average)	Session 3: Curation for human health and nutrition 4	Session 3: Curation for human health and nutrition 5 (best)	Session 3: Curation for human health and nutrition Did not attend
Session 4: Database journal sessions	Session 4: Database journal sessions 1 (worst)	Session 4: Database journal sessions 2	Session 4: Database journal sessions 3 (average)	Session 4: Database journal sessions 4	Session 4: Database journal sessions 5 (best)	Session 4: Database journal sessions Did not attend
Session 5: Data standards and ontologies: Making data FAIR	Session 5: Data standards and ontologies: Making data FAIR 1 (worst)	Session 5: Data standards and ontologies: Making data FAIR 2	Session 5: Data standards and ontologies: Making data FAIR 3 (average)	Session 5: Data standards and ontologies: Making data FAIR 4	Session 5: Data standards and ontologies: Making data FAIR 5 (best)	Session 5: Data standards and ontologies: Making data FAIR Did not attend
Session 6: Interacting with the research community	Session 6: Interacting with the research community 1 (worst)	Session 6: Interacting with the research community 2	Session 6: Interacting with the research community 3 (average)	Session 6: Interacting with the research community 4	Session 6: Interacting with the research community 5 (best)	Session 6: Interacting with the research community Did not attend

Question Title

* 6. Did the talks and sessions address new areas of biocuration?

Yes

Question Title

* 7. With regards to the poster session, where there are constraints on space how would you like to see the poster session run?

Continue to have all posters displayed at the same time

Hold a number of sessions where set numbers of posters are displayed; eg Half the poster number on one day; half on another day.

No preference

Question Title

* 8. What was the best thing about the conference?

Question Title

* 9. What was the worst thing about the conference?

Question Title

* 10. Are you a member of the ISB?

Yes

Question Title

* 11. Are you planning to attend Biocuration 2020 in Bar Harbor, Maine?

Yes

Don't know

Biocuration 2019