Objective of article 
Upon completion of this educational activity, the participant will be able to:
  • Recall the prevalence of common chromosomal abnormalities (Q1)
  • Discuss the risk of miscarriage related to different screening strategies (Q2)
  • Compare the economic impact of different screening/diagnosis strategies when used in populations with similar risk (Q3)
  • Assess the potential problems with cell-free testing when used in broader populations with lower risk of chromosomal abnormalities (Q4 and 5)

Question Title

1. Which of the following statements is true regarding the prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities. (Required.)

Question Title

2. According to the results of SAFE21 trial, in women with a first trimester screening risk between 1/5 and 1/250 the sequential use of cell-free DNA and invasive testing over direct invasive testing has the following effect on miscarriage rates (Required.)

Question Title

3. According to the results of this study, which of the following is a potential disadvantage of cell-free DNA testing over amniocentesis when used on women with the same risk intervals. (Required.)

Question Title

4. The incorporation of cell-free DNA testing in women with lower risk cut-offs for chromosomal abnormalities has the following effect (Required.)

Question Title

5. What would be the detrimental effects of screening with cell-free DNA testing in the general population (Required.)

0 of 5 answered
 

T