Researcher reputation management, Spring 2016 Survey

	1 (not important)	2	3	4	5	6	7 (extremely important)
Educators / students in your field	Educators / students in your field 1 (not important)	Educators / students in your field 2	Educators / students in your field 3	Educators / students in your field 4	Educators / students in your field 5	Educators / students in your field 6	Educators / students in your field 7 (extremely important)
Broader public / non-specialist audiences	Broader public / non-specialist audiences 1 (not important)	Broader public / non-specialist audiences 2	Broader public / non-specialist audiences 3	Broader public / non-specialist audiences 4	Broader public / non-specialist audiences 5	Broader public / non-specialist audiences 6	Broader public / non-specialist audiences 7 (extremely important)
Other researchers / academics in your field	Other researchers / academics in your field 1 (not important)	Other researchers / academics in your field 2	Other researchers / academics in your field 3	Other researchers / academics in your field 4	Other researchers / academics in your field 5	Other researchers / academics in your field 6	Other researchers / academics in your field 7 (extremely important)
Journalists and the media	Journalists and the media 1 (not important)	Journalists and the media 2	Journalists and the media 3	Journalists and the media 4	Journalists and the media 5	Journalists and the media 6	Journalists and the media 7 (extremely important)
Researchers / academics in associated disciplines	Researchers / academics in associated disciplines 1 (not important)	Researchers / academics in associated disciplines 2	Researchers / academics in associated disciplines 3	Researchers / academics in associated disciplines 4	Researchers / academics in associated disciplines 5	Researchers / academics in associated disciplines 6	Researchers / academics in associated disciplines 7 (extremely important)
Relevant companies / industry	Relevant companies / industry 1 (not important)	Relevant companies / industry 2	Relevant companies / industry 3	Relevant companies / industry 4	Relevant companies / industry 5	Relevant companies / industry 6	Relevant companies / industry 7 (extremely important)
Professionals / practitioners in your field	Professionals / practitioners in your field 1 (not important)	Professionals / practitioners in your field 2	Professionals / practitioners in your field 3	Professionals / practitioners in your field 4	Professionals / practitioners in your field 5	Professionals / practitioners in your field 6	Professionals / practitioners in your field 7 (extremely important)
Funders	Funders 1 (not important)	Funders 2	Funders 3	Funders 4	Funders 5	Funders 6	Funders 7 (extremely important)
Government / policy-makers	Government / policy-makers 1 (not important)	Government / policy-makers 2	Government / policy-makers 3	Government / policy-makers 4	Government / policy-makers 5	Government / policy-makers 6	Government / policy-makers 7 (extremely important)

1 (not important)

7 (extremely important)

Educators / students in your field

Educators / students in your field 1 (not important)

Educators / students in your field 2

Educators / students in your field 3

Educators / students in your field 4

Educators / students in your field 5

Educators / students in your field 6

Educators / students in your field 7 (extremely important)

Broader public / non-specialist audiences

Broader public / non-specialist audiences 1 (not important)

Broader public / non-specialist audiences 2

Broader public / non-specialist audiences 3

Broader public / non-specialist audiences 4

Broader public / non-specialist audiences 5

Broader public / non-specialist audiences 6

Broader public / non-specialist audiences 7 (extremely important)

Other researchers / academics in your field

Other researchers / academics in your field 1 (not important)

Other researchers / academics in your field 2

Other researchers / academics in your field 3

Other researchers / academics in your field 4

Other researchers / academics in your field 5

Other researchers / academics in your field 6

Other researchers / academics in your field 7 (extremely important)

Journalists and the media

Journalists and the media 1 (not important)

Journalists and the media 2

Journalists and the media 3

Journalists and the media 4

Journalists and the media 5

Journalists and the media 6

Journalists and the media 7 (extremely important)

Researchers / academics in associated disciplines

Researchers / academics in associated disciplines 1 (not important)

Researchers / academics in associated disciplines 2

Researchers / academics in associated disciplines 3

Researchers / academics in associated disciplines 4

Researchers / academics in associated disciplines 5

Researchers / academics in associated disciplines 6

Researchers / academics in associated disciplines 7 (extremely important)

Relevant companies / industry

Relevant companies / industry 1 (not important)

Relevant companies / industry 2

Relevant companies / industry 3

Relevant companies / industry 4

Relevant companies / industry 5

Relevant companies / industry 6

Relevant companies / industry 7 (extremely important)

Professionals / practitioners in your field

Professionals / practitioners in your field 1 (not important)

Professionals / practitioners in your field 2

Professionals / practitioners in your field 3

Professionals / practitioners in your field 4

Professionals / practitioners in your field 5

Professionals / practitioners in your field 6

Professionals / practitioners in your field 7 (extremely important)

Funders

Funders 1 (not important)

Funders 2

Funders 3

Funders 4

Funders 5

Funders 6

Funders 7 (extremely important)

Government / policy-makers

Government / policy-makers 1 (not important)

Government / policy-makers 2

Government / policy-makers 3

Government / policy-makers 4

Government / policy-makers 5

Government / policy-makers 6

Government / policy-makers 7 (extremely important)

Question Title

* 2. To what extent do you think more could be done to increase the visibility, usage or impact of the work you publish, on or after publication?

I don’t believe that the visibility, usage or impact of my articles could be improved

I believe the visibility, usage or impact of my articles could be somewhat improved

I believe the visibility, usage or impact of my articles could be significantly improved

I don’t know

Question Title

* 3. What is your attitude towards sharing information about your publications with peers and others?

Strongly supportive - I want to ensure as many people as possible find, read and apply / cite my work

Supportive - it is becoming a necessity if I want to ensure people notice my work

Neutral - I do not have a strong view

Against - I do not feel my work requires sharing beyond the process of publication

Strongly against - it is not appropriate for researchers to promote their own work

Do you have any further comments about sharing your work?

	1 (should have least responsibility)	2	3	4	5	6	7 (should have most responsibility)
Myself	Myself 1 (should have least responsibility)	Myself 2	Myself 3	Myself 4	Myself 5	Myself 6	Myself 7 (should have most responsibility)
The publisher / society that published my article	The publisher / society that published my article 1 (should have least responsibility)	The publisher / society that published my article 2	The publisher / society that published my article 3	The publisher / society that published my article 4	The publisher / society that published my article 5	The publisher / society that published my article 6	The publisher / society that published my article 7 (should have most responsibility)
My professional association / society	My professional association / society 1 (should have least responsibility)	My professional association / society 2	My professional association / society 3	My professional association / society 4	My professional association / society 5	My professional association / society 6	My professional association / society 7 (should have most responsibility)
My co-authors	My co-authors 1 (should have least responsibility)	My co-authors 2	My co-authors 3	My co-authors 4	My co-authors 5	My co-authors 6	My co-authors 7 (should have most responsibility)
My funder	My funder 1 (should have least responsibility)	My funder 2	My funder 3	My funder 4	My funder 5	My funder 6	My funder 7 (should have most responsibility)
My institution	My institution 1 (should have least responsibility)	My institution 2	My institution 3	My institution 4	My institution 5	My institution 6	My institution 7 (should have most responsibility)
My colleagues and peers in the field	My colleagues and peers in the field 1 (should have least responsibility)	My colleagues and peers in the field 2	My colleagues and peers in the field 3	My colleagues and peers in the field 4	My colleagues and peers in the field 5	My colleagues and peers in the field 6	My colleagues and peers in the field 7 (should have most responsibility)

1 (should have least responsibility)

7 (should have most responsibility)

Myself

Myself 1 (should have least responsibility)

Myself 2

Myself 3

Myself 4

Myself 5

Myself 6

Myself 7 (should have most responsibility)

The publisher / society that published my article

The publisher / society that published my article 1 (should have least responsibility)

The publisher / society that published my article 2

The publisher / society that published my article 3

The publisher / society that published my article 4

The publisher / society that published my article 5

The publisher / society that published my article 6

The publisher / society that published my article 7 (should have most responsibility)

My professional association / society

My professional association / society 1 (should have least responsibility)

My professional association / society 2

My professional association / society 3

My professional association / society 4

My professional association / society 5

My professional association / society 6

My professional association / society 7 (should have most responsibility)

My co-authors

My co-authors 1 (should have least responsibility)

My co-authors 2

My co-authors 3

My co-authors 4

My co-authors 5

My co-authors 6

My co-authors 7 (should have most responsibility)

My funder

My funder 1 (should have least responsibility)

My funder 2

My funder 3

My funder 4

My funder 5

My funder 6

My funder 7 (should have most responsibility)

My institution

My institution 1 (should have least responsibility)

My institution 2

My institution 3

My institution 4

My institution 5

My institution 6

My institution 7 (should have most responsibility)

My colleagues and peers in the field

My colleagues and peers in the field 1 (should have least responsibility)

My colleagues and peers in the field 2

My colleagues and peers in the field 3

My colleagues and peers in the field 4

My colleagues and peers in the field 5

My colleagues and peers in the field 6

My colleagues and peers in the field 7 (should have most responsibility)

Researcher reputation management, Spring 2016

Part 1: Your publications

Question Title

* 1. How important is it to you that each of the following audiences read and understand your work?

Question Title

* 2. To what extent do you think more could be done to increase the visibility, usage or impact of the work you publish, on or after publication?

Question Title

* 3. What is your attitude towards sharing information about your publications with peers and others?

Question Title

* 4. Please rate the following for how much responsibility you think they should have for ensuring your published works are as widely read and cited as possible: