Skip to content
CHEAD Conference 2016 Delegate Survey
1.
How did you hear about the conference?
Invitation by CHEAD through your institutions membership
Suggestion by a colleague to attend
Via the CHEAD website
Other
2.
What did you expect to get from the conference, in relation to the particular demands of your role in HE?
3.
Please indicate your overall satisfaction with the conference.
Very Satisfied
Somewhat Satisfied
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied
Somewhat Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
4.
Please give your ratings 1-5 for the different sessions, with 5 being outstanding and 1 being unsatisfactory?
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
Rebecca Blackman, Arts Council England
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
Stephen Perkins, Herman Miller
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
Claire Doherty, Situations
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
Simon Morrissey, Foreground
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
Kate Brindley, Arnolfini
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
Rosemary Harden, Fashion Museum Bath
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
Alison Bevan, RWA & Happy Museum
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
Gary Sangster, Arts Catalyst
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
Professor Christina Slade, Bath Spa University
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
Michael Marra, Design in Action
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
Jo Nolan, Screen South
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
Kayla Rose, Bristol & Bath by Design & Dr Graham McLaren, Bristol & Bath by Design
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
Sir John Sorrell CBE
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
Professor Neil Mulholland
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
Dr George Windsor, NESTA
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
Professor Gavin Turk
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
S Mark Gubb
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
Dr Simeon Nelson
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
Rabab Ghazoul
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
5.
What was most valuable about the conference?
The presentations
The workshops
The Friday afternoon visits
Networking
Time away from your institute to absorb and reflect
Other (please specify)
6.
What was least valuable about the conference?
The presentations
The workshops
The Friday afternoon visits
Networking
Time away from your institute to absorb and reflect
Other (please specify)
7.
Did you think the structure of each day at the conference was:
Well paced
Just right
Too dense
8.
Did you think the time for networking was:
Too much
Just enough
Too little
9.
How would you rate the following items? Please use the scala of 1-5 with 5 being outstanding and 1 being unsatisfactory.
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
Relevance of conference contents
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
Quality of presentations
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
Information available online
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
Registration process
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
Conference venues/facilities
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
Organisational arrangements for and during the event
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
Dates of the conference
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
Social and networking events
Unsatisfactory
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Outstanding
10.
Is there anything else you would like to share with us?